Voluntary Euthanasia Society, Auckland, New Zealand
Voluntary Euthanasia Logo
Home
What's New
The Issues
Rules of the VES
The Law in New Zealand
Euthanasia News
DWD Bill
Polls
Articles on Voluntary Euthanasia
Links to other VE Societies
Join the Society
Contact us

CANADA

Latimer 10 years on: No regrets
Toronto Star Jan. 24, 2004.

A decade after killing his disabled daughter, Tracy, and igniting a national debate on euthanasia, Robert Latimer offers no regrets, no excuses and no apologies.

"It was the right thing to do," Latimer said yesterday in a rare interview, at the minimum-security William Head Institution, 30 kilometres west of here.

Overlooking the Pacific Ocean on a dreary winter's day, Latimer, 50, spent two hours reiterating what he has said from the outset of this intensely emotional case: He ended Tracy's life a month short of her 13th birthday to stop the excruciating pain that ruled it.

It's a belief that he insists has never wavered since Oct. 24, 1993. That day, while the rest of his family was at church, Latimer wrapped his 38-pound daughter, who suffered from severe cerebral palsy, in a blanket, put her in the front seat of his pickup truck at their farm in Wilkie, Sask., attached a hose from the exhaust to the cab and started the ignition.

It's a belief that has prevailed despite his having been found guilty of second-degree murder at two trials and despite the upholding of the verdict at the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, a final loss at the Supreme Court of Canada and, as of last Sunday, three years in the federal prison system.

And it's a belief that allows him what he calls "a feeling of contentment" even as he denounces the courts, politicians and those he insists are among the minority of Canadians who feel his conviction and 10-year minimum sentence are just.

"I have a positive frame of mind in knowing that what I did was right," Latimer said. "That's certainly not something that all their rulings would ever darken."

Clad in a white T-shirt and blue jeans, Latimer looked more relaxed than the pictures shot as he made his way to prison three years ago. His face has thinned and his gray hair has turned grayer. But the handshake is still the firm grip of a Saskatchewan farmer. And even though he's somewhat shy at the outset, he quickly warms up, punctuating his comments with nods of his head and comfortable laughter.

Even though his blue eyes harden as the subject turns to his anger and frustration at a verdict he considers unjust, his tone of voice remains soft, reasoned, thoughtful.

"I just have some real problems with their decision, as does much of the country," he said of the Supreme Court's 2001 ruling and its refusal a year later to reopen it.

There have been calls for clemency and the top court even referred to the federal cabinet's ability to exercise a so-called royal prerogative of mercy on Latimer. But Latimer said it's "pointless" for him to apply for one as long as there's a belief, as the ruling concluded, that he could and should have done more to ease Tracy's pain.

"To our opponents, Tracy's pain was a side issue, something they are very capable of ignoring," he said. "But to us, it was a very real situation confronting us every day."

Tracy Latimer was born in North Battleford, Sask., in 1980. Brain-damaged at birth, she was soon diagnosed with severe cerebral palsy, a condition that typically causes the body to be wracked by painful seizures. She did not walk or talk and was unable to feed herself.

Tracy, whose mental age was estimated at about three months, had four operations by age 11 in an attempt to increase mobility and alleviate pain, including back surgery in August, 1992, in which two stainless steel rods were put on either side of her backbone.

"When you held her, her back was as stiff as three-quarter-inch plywood," Robert Latimer said yesterday. In the final months of her life, Tracy had up to eight seizures a day, no longer slept and frequently cried out in pain, he said.

Asked about trial testimony and comments from others who knew Tracy and said she enjoyed music and loved lying in front of the television to listen to the roars of Hockey Night in Canada telecasts, he smiled at the memories but said that had stopped much earlier.

"That was from a very different time in her life," Latimer said softly.

Tracy was due to have a fifth operation, in which a feeding tube would be inserted to try to strengthen her for surgery on a permanently dislocated hip that was to include removing a part of her upper leg.

It was a pain her father decided she could not be asked to endure.

"Ultimately, I've always believed this case should have been decided by a jury, but that wasn't allowed to happen," Latimer said. "That's just wrong."

Actually, juries did convict Latimer. But his anger arises from the fact that in the second trial, the 12 members wanted him sentenced to one year in jail and another under house arrest. The judge obliged but was overruled at the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, which imposed a 10-year minimum jail sentence. His defence of a necessity to kill was also rejected.

"I certainly have my opponents but I know the thinking people in this country are on my side and for that I am ever grateful," he said. "Their support is amazing."

While Latimer and his wife, Laura, remain "overwhelmed" by the support they've received in letters, pleas for clemency, candlelight vigils, $250,000 in donations to a family trust fund and other acts of generosity, he said that it would not surprise him if he stays in prison until Dec. 8, 2007, when he's eligible for day parole.

"It's their game and you have to play by their rules," he said of the law.

Latimer has been jailed since Jan. 18, 2001, the day the Supreme Court of Canada ended his judicial appeals in the case. The top court, which had earlier ordered a new trial after revelations of jury tampering at the first one, upheld both his 1997 conviction for second-degree murder and a 1998 ruling from the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal that he must serve a mandatory life term with no chance of parole for at least 10 years.

While acknowledging that Latimer "faced challenges of the sort most Canadians can only imagine" and his care of Tracy "for many years was admirable," the seven justices nevertheless concluded killing her was wrong, even if he called it an act of mercy.

"His decision to end his daughter's life was an error in judgment," they ruled. "The taking of another life represents the most serious crime in our criminal law."

The decision of the Supreme Court justices was unanimous. The judgment of the rest of Canadians has been anything but.

Latimer's many critics believe that far from being an act of compassion by a loving father, killing Tracy was playing God and wiping out a precious life. They believe, in the words of prosecutor Randy Kirkham at the first trial in 1994, that condoning such an act would be tantamount to declaring it "open season on the disabled."

But to a legion of supporters, including hundreds who offered to serve one month of his sentence and thousands who wrote letters on his behalf to the Supreme Court and federal and provincial politicians, Latimer did nothing more than end the agony of a beloved child. Jailing him prolongs the pain and, they argue, represents cruel and unusual punishment.

Since early October, Latimer has been serving time at William Head, a
160-inmate facility on 34 hectares of prime waterfront real estate in the suburban community of Metchosin. Prisoners live in groups of five in residential-style, two-storey duplexes. Each has his own bedroom and can order groceries they cook themselves in their kitchen.

Latimer, who spent nearly two years at the medium-security Bowden Institution in central Alberta, is enrolled in an electrician's course William Head. He also spends time taking long walks along the shoreline of the sprawling grounds, the main exercise he now uses to keep his weight at about 200 pounds, 35 pounds lighter than when he was jailed.

Although it's a much longer journey for his family than the four-hour drive from the farm to Bowden, Latimer's wife, Laura, and their youngest son, 10, visited recently, staying with him in a separate house for a few days. His oldest son, 20, and 18-year-old daughter may come over Easter, he said. Other family members who live nearby also drop by.

"It's probably one of the nicer surroundings if you have to be in prison," Latimer said with a laugh in a room that looked down on to a beachside playground, a swing set, teeter-totters, picnic tables and a couple of big yellow toy trucks left sitting in a sandbox.

But also within view are stark reminders that this is no West Coast bed and breakfast - a tall chain-link fence topped with razor wire and, further off in the distance, a watchtower.